FOUR HORSEMEN – The Debate

It is GOOD to see a “Four Horsemen” debate from two years ago, even though this particular one was limited to analysis of only two horsemen, namely Capitalism and “Diet” Communism (i.e. “Socialism”) – whereas as some suggest based on their study of the pages of REVELATION 6, the four horsemen represent FOUR MAJOR IDEOLOGIES that have dominated mankind over the past two millennia.

THE FOUR HORSEMEN from the pages of REVELATION CHAPTER 6 possibly represent #1) CATHOLICISM, #2) COMMUNISM, #3) CAPITALISM, and #4) ISLAMISM – or rather, extreme (per)versions of these – as used by the ultra-elite “powers that be” to consolidate their power and control over nations and humanity.

#1) The Jesuit strand of Catholicism seems to seek to bring (by infiltration and covert operations) ALL authorities from all nations, both secular and religious, under the authority of the Pope (as was the case in Europe once upon a time).

#2) Communist revolutions of the 20th century came with much, much bloodshed.

#3) Famine: And one of the hallmarks of “crony capitalism” (not true capitalism, but a fascistic perversion that involves the collusion of corporatists and those in government against the people) we see empirically are the periodic recessions it engenders (and I would say it is a deliberate aim of the profiteering crony capitalists).

#4) Fundamentalist Islamism, with some good deal of backing by the U.S. CIA & State Department, has in the last several decades become a force to be reckoned with across the globe.

“Four Horsemen – The Debate”

The Moderator’s Introduction:

The Panelists:

The CONSENSUS among the panelists is that people – including the youth – need to RE-ENGAGE the matter of economics.

Audience Contribution: In my opinion, the best audience contribution came around the 55th minute of the video, where a lady correctly notes that the biggest change that occurred in the West following World War 2 – which the “pseudo science” of neo-classical economics completely IGNORES – is that private banks create a greater proportion of the money supply today than . (Perhaps the globalist, banking ultra-elite are behind this elephant-in-the-room-type silence about the role of banks in money creation in our society. Perhaps the influence of this banking elite on the development of this neo-classical economics ought to be considered…)

May great points and insights in the debate. I would love to know what stuck out the most for you from the debate in the comments section below.

Without further ado, here is the video of the debate…

~  All the best!